caddyman: (I've had enough of this!)
caddyman ([personal profile] caddyman) wrote2008-12-09 11:59 am

(no subject)

Will someone explain to me why it is considered unacceptable to assassinate one’s ‘superiors’? Not necessarily for a single, or even a second transgression, but certainly one it has become clear that the stupidity is habitual and ingrained.

Having insisted that we cannot delay (though it would make life operationally easier, with no clear disbenefit1) to either us or stakeholders, we have had to cram in a meeting tomorrow that would have been better held next week. Having set that meeting and had people turn over their calendars to make it, she then insisted we put it back a half hour. That means the meeting can only last a half hour as necessary attendees have other commitments. So there we are; rearranged again.

Having created all the havoc in the world, we are now informed she has a prior appointment and cannot attend anyway.

Why is it not permissible to put these people out of my misery?


1A bastard word, but annoyingly, one that more closely approaches the concept than say, drawback, disadvantage or downside.

[identity profile] sack-boy.livejournal.com 2008-12-09 05:01 pm (UTC)(link)
There is nothing wrong with assassinating superiors, it's getting caught that's the issue. As ever.

[identity profile] bluesman.livejournal.com 2008-12-09 06:02 pm (UTC)(link)
There's your answer, Bry.
(deleted comment)

[identity profile] pauln.livejournal.com 2008-12-10 09:15 am (UTC)(link)
Not the Mithridates Eupator route then (molten gold down the throat).