Smile Time

[caddyman]

It seems that I shall have to increase the quality of the pictures I take since shrinking them to half size or so to post them up here really screws with the quality. And I must get rid of the bloody time stamp, too. Nevertheless, this one is just about OK despite being gamma-corrected (Must remember to turn flash back on) and shrunk to fit.



Here we see Miss Furtle dozing happily under the watchful eye of a friend. I am not saying it is related, but I woke up this morning with five bites on my left calf, whilst Miss Furtle sported one. Luckily I had Anthisan available or I should be spending a day of unhappy scratching.

Edited to add: In no way do I wish to be the author of Bin's brane going "poing" and sliding out from his ears (entertaining though that might be), and since he kindly provided the relevant html, I have splodged¹ the smaller version of the picture in with associated clickety link to the gopping big version.

¹Technical term.

Comments

[failing-angel.livejournal.com]

Is that an Angel plushie I can see there?

[agentinfinity.livejournal.com]

When Jamie first got his digital camera we found that the pictures were crap quality as we couldn't fit many high quality ones on the memory card. He picked up a memory card for not very much and can fit a ton of medium quality pics on now which are much better, I dunno if this is your problem as well. Also, JPEGS will mange up pictures because of the way they store data.

[fencingsculptor.livejournal.com]

Miss Furtle shares her bed with a Monster ?!?

*Sniggers and runs away*

[binidj.livejournal.com]

Of course photographs are nicest when under a cut-tag or sized at about 200px with a clicky to a full-sized version:

For which the html is:

<a href="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v706/enrico_cadillac/Angelfurtle.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v706/enrico_cadillac/Angelfurtle.jpg" width="200px" border="none"/></a>