Smile Time

Tuesday, August 29th, 2006 10:22 am
caddyman: (Smile Time)
[personal profile] caddyman
It seems that I shall have to increase the quality of the pictures I take since shrinking them to half size or so to post them up here really screws with the quality. And I must get rid of the bloody time stamp, too. Nevertheless, this one is just about OK despite being gamma-corrected (Must remember to turn flash back on) and shrunk to fit.



Here we see Miss Furtle dozing happily under the watchful eye of a friend. I am not saying it is related, but I woke up this morning with five bites on my left calf, whilst Miss Furtle sported one. Luckily I had Anthisan available or I should be spending a day of unhappy scratching.

Edited to add: In no way do I wish to be the author of Bin's brane going "poing" and sliding out from his ears (entertaining though that might be), and since he kindly provided the relevant html, I have splodged1 the smaller version of the picture in with associated clickety link to the gopping big version.

1Technical term.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-29 10:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] failing-angel.livejournal.com
Is that an Angel plushie I can see there?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-29 10:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] failing-angel.livejournal.com
Why the arguably?

I spotted this (http://www.websonic.co.uk/cinemastore/details.asp?ProductID=418) in the window of the cinema store at the weekend.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-29 11:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] caddyman.livejournal.com
It was a cagey response in preparation for the inevitable fell wit which never came...

Paranoia, see, when you have friends like mine.

Yeah, I nearly bought the vampy version, but wasn't so keen. The battle-damaged version was a suitable compromise: having missed the original version, I am not willing to splash out the silly prices it is fetching on ebay.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-29 11:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] failing-angel.livejournal.com
Ah, I saw the vampy version at the store - if I had the cash, I could be tempted.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-29 10:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] agentinfinity.livejournal.com
When Jamie first got his digital camera we found that the pictures were crap quality as we couldn't fit many high quality ones on the memory card. He picked up a memory card for not very much and can fit a ton of medium quality pics on now which are much better, I dunno if this is your problem as well. Also, JPEGS will mange up pictures because of the way they store data.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-29 10:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] caddyman.livejournal.com
I bought a 512mB memory card at the same time as I bougfht the camera, so that shouldn't be the problem. Most likely I have inadvertently set the picture size too small whilst tinkering with other settings and am not getting the best resolution from the camera.

Time I read the destructions, I guess...

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-29 12:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] agentinfinity.livejournal.com
Probably, the low quality setting on our camera is crap.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-29 10:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fencingsculptor.livejournal.com
Miss Furtle shares her bed with a Monster ?!?

*Sniggers and runs away*

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-29 12:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] binidj.livejournal.com
Of course photographs are nicest when under a cut-tag or sized at about 200px with a clicky to a full-sized version:

For which the html is:

<a href="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v706/enrico_cadillac/Angelfurtle.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v706/enrico_cadillac/Angelfurtle.jpg" width="200px" border="none"/></a>

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-29 01:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] caddyman.livejournal.com
Be ye hinting or sommat, Bin, Old Boy?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-29 01:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] binidj.livejournal.com
Think of it as a polite request, together with the tools to do the job.

Large images on a low-rez screen are a royal pain in the arse little inconvenient.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-29 01:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] caddyman.livejournal.com
Just because it's you and you asked so nicely...

(no subject)

Date: 2006-08-29 01:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] binidj.livejournal.com
Thanks, you're a love.

Profile

caddyman: (Default)
caddyman

April 2023

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
1617 1819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags