Is there such a word...?
Wednesday, January 14th, 2004 11:07 pmA US policeman has just used the phrase '..there was no evidentiary link..'on the History channel.
All my dictionaries are in the office, so I can't confirm my suspicion that this is drivel.
All my dictionaries are in the office, so I can't confirm my suspicion that this is drivel.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-01-14 03:51 pm (UTC)For the presentation or determination of evidence: an evidentiary hearing.
:)
(no subject)
Date: 2004-01-14 04:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-01-14 04:10 pm (UTC)Which I have to abuse my keyboard with on a regular (HTML) basis.
Unless the word is used in relation to someone who divides things into 100s or 1/100ths ?
(no subject)
Date: 2004-01-14 04:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-01-15 02:48 am (UTC)It's the coining of new words simply because the person trying to speak doesn't realise that an appropriate word already exists. My Times dictionary ignores the very existence of 'evidentiary' and the OED merely defines it as 'evidential'. This leads me to the conclusion that it is a made up word which has gained currency.
My current bugbear is 'Quadrilogy' which, I suspect will replace the more correct but little known 'tetralogy'...
(no subject)
Date: 2004-01-15 02:54 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-01-15 03:07 am (UTC)Tetralogy is a pure-bred word from the Greek.
I have nothing against English 'borrowing' words from other languages - that's what made the language great - but again, it's the coining of new ones where there is already a proper word there. See 'shortfall' v. 'deficit' and 'ongoing' v. 'continuing' for further examples.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-01-15 07:09 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-01-15 03:48 pm (UTC)