![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
caddymanOne of the things I have to address on my 'Evidence Form' in the job selection process is 'Deployability'.
The guidance stresses that it is not a measure of how many posts we have held, but - briefly, I have to demonstrate 'adaptability', 'initiative' and 'collaborative behaviour'. It gives a little more detail on each of these.
Below, there is a little, badly written note seemingly in pidgin English, doubtless the result of some poor editing:
I am assuming that it won't count if someone was assessed as, "Actually a bit crap at the job, but a really snappy dresser".
The guidance stresses that it is not a measure of how many posts we have held, but - briefly, I have to demonstrate 'adaptability', 'initiative' and 'collaborative behaviour'. It gives a little more detail on each of these.
Below, there is a little, badly written note seemingly in pidgin English, doubtless the result of some poor editing:
"NB: Deployability is NOT measuring breath of experience throughout you a more flexible fit in the future organisation. It is about measuri Style on the above indicators" (sic)
I am assuming that it won't count if someone was assessed as, "Actually a bit crap at the job, but a really snappy dresser".
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2011-06-21 08:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-06-21 08:50 pm (UTC)Fills me with sorrow that the Muppets behind this sort of embarrassing writing aren't the ones in the firing line.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-06-21 11:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-06-22 08:03 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-06-22 09:13 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-06-22 10:07 am (UTC)