How to answer the door in certain circumstances
Wednesday, October 19th, 2005 05:46 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
This is in answer to a post by
mr_h_r_hughes. It is advice given to me many years ago, and I feel it should be passed on for the benefit of humankind generally.
Scenario: You are enjoying the free and quiet possession of your own home - and remember, it is your castle - there is a knock at the front door, or a ring of the bell.
You answer the door to find that there are two persons with earnest smiles standing there. They may, or may not have leaflets in evidence. There will be at least one briefcase.
Identifying themselves, in order of probability for the UK (this should be reversed in parts of North America), as Jehovah's Witnesses or Mormons, they will ask (and I believe the form of words is mandatory) "Have you thought about letting Jesus into your home?"
The correct and approved response at this time is to say simply, "He is welcome always. You pair, however, can fuck off".
It is permissible, indeed expected at this point, to slam the door in their faces.
Edited to add:
Just to be clear: I have no argument with a person having religion. It's thweird cults I don't like.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Scenario: You are enjoying the free and quiet possession of your own home - and remember, it is your castle - there is a knock at the front door, or a ring of the bell.
You answer the door to find that there are two persons with earnest smiles standing there. They may, or may not have leaflets in evidence. There will be at least one briefcase.
Identifying themselves, in order of probability for the UK (this should be reversed in parts of North America), as Jehovah's Witnesses or Mormons, they will ask (and I believe the form of words is mandatory) "Have you thought about letting Jesus into your home?"
The correct and approved response at this time is to say simply, "He is welcome always. You pair, however, can fuck off".
It is permissible, indeed expected at this point, to slam the door in their faces.
Edited to add:
Just to be clear: I have no argument with a person having religion. It's thweird cults I don't like.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-19 05:28 pm (UTC)Besides you didn't see these ones, I was feeling far more sinful after meeting them before which is probably not the effect they were going for : )
(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-19 07:19 pm (UTC)Are you the same Von Twine I have met, or are you a pod pretending?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-20 09:45 am (UTC)I can be rude to you, you have a healthy constitution.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-19 05:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-19 07:21 pm (UTC)They should be busy turning the other cheek (or rather they would if they had a proper religion, not their bizarre little sect).
(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-19 06:56 pm (UTC)Or so Jasper Carrott says.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-19 09:55 pm (UTC)It was very amusing (in a slightly cruel way) when
Entirely the fastest way I've ever found to get rid of Jehovahs Witnesses is to tell them you're a practising Catholic. First time I tried it I literally didn't see them for dust.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-20 12:25 am (UTC)Funny things 'The Witnesses'. My colleague Andy is always one for rigorous religious debate. Especially when 'they' have an annual conference in Nottingham Ice Arena which is approximately 19 metres away from my shop's front door. Oh, that's always a fun Saturday afternoon. Like clockwork.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-20 01:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-19 07:17 pm (UTC)I personally offer to swap a daily satanist for one of their watch towers.
Taht generally gets them running
(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-20 12:26 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-20 04:13 pm (UTC)As a crusty old wiccan i can say YES!
(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-19 08:17 pm (UTC)Did you really say that to them? I suppose my version would be, "Yep, He's been happily kipping here since 1994, but you addlepated nerks can bugger off before I set the dog on you."
Speaking of which, I never had bother from either of those cults when I lived in Sunny Highland, CA. None of them seemed zealous enough to jump the fence into my yard, and face my two lively Alsatians.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-19 08:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-19 09:56 pm (UTC)(no, not Phil Collins.)
(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-20 09:57 am (UTC)I also have the dubious accolade of having convinced a Jehovah's Witness that she was wrong - convinced her enough to bin her literature and get on the next bus. She was trying to convince me that all heavy metal fans are Satansits. Funnily enough she didn't have anything to back her argument.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-20 01:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-20 05:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-20 09:21 pm (UTC)Anyway, if only a tiny proportion of folksies are allowed into heaven on judgement day why would I buy their watchtower rather than flogging me own???? Or did I miss something?
apologies for random comment...was playing the nth friend of nth friend game and couldn't help meself!
(yeah, yeah...I know!)
(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-21 10:10 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-21 10:26 am (UTC)