Saturday, October 13th, 2007

A Curate's Egg

Saturday, October 13th, 2007 09:56 am
caddyman: (Default)
Please to explain how Al Gore has managed to wangle a Nobel Peace Prize (and indeed, an Oscar)?

I suppose it is because there would be too much opposition to awarding him one of the Nobel science prizes on account of his well-meaning but inaccurate movie, An Inconvenient Truth.

The problem, to my mind, is that this is the sort of thing: major inaccuracies in a film that should spark debate on an important subject is actually counter productive. We have, by US standards, a left wing politician with possible ambitions on the White House, pedalling a worthy, if "right-on" message that big business would probably like to ignore. He has ham-fistedly taken a global issue and placed it in the centre of US party politics, when it could have been placed above sectarian posturing. He has riddled his own propaganda with scientific sensationalism and inconsistencies and given the very people it is aimed at the space to dismiss the problem and avoid working to a solution.

Would Jed Bartlett have made such a mistake? He had better scriptwriters, methinks.

A Curate's Egg

Saturday, October 13th, 2007 09:56 am
caddyman: (Default)
Please to explain how Al Gore has managed to wangle a Nobel Peace Prize (and indeed, an Oscar)?

I suppose it is because there would be too much opposition to awarding him one of the Nobel science prizes on account of his well-meaning but inaccurate movie, An Inconvenient Truth.

The problem, to my mind, is that this is the sort of thing: major inaccuracies in a film that should spark debate on an important subject is actually counter productive. We have, by US standards, a left wing politician with possible ambitions on the White House, pedalling a worthy, if "right-on" message that big business would probably like to ignore. He has ham-fistedly taken a global issue and placed it in the centre of US party politics, when it could have been placed above sectarian posturing. He has riddled his own propaganda with scientific sensationalism and inconsistencies and given the very people it is aimed at the space to dismiss the problem and avoid working to a solution.

Would Jed Bartlett have made such a mistake? He had better scriptwriters, methinks.

Saturday thus far

Saturday, October 13th, 2007 02:34 pm
caddyman: (Default)
Ah, I am enjoying today.

Cages knowingly and impishly rattled this morning, international football this afternoon and World Cup rugby this evening.

Furtle will most likely be making more DONK and we have plenty of Remegel!

Saturday thus far

Saturday, October 13th, 2007 02:34 pm
caddyman: (Default)
Ah, I am enjoying today.

Cages knowingly and impishly rattled this morning, international football this afternoon and World Cup rugby this evening.

Furtle will most likely be making more DONK and we have plenty of Remegel!

Long wait

Saturday, October 13th, 2007 07:15 pm
caddyman: (Default)
You wouldn't believe just how long it takes to drain the water out of a shark that's been in the bath for a few hours.

That is all.

Long wait

Saturday, October 13th, 2007 07:15 pm
caddyman: (Default)
You wouldn't believe just how long it takes to drain the water out of a shark that's been in the bath for a few hours.

That is all.

Profile

caddyman: (Default)
caddyman

April 2023

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
1617 1819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags