Hmm...

Friday, December 9th, 2005 12:18 pm
caddyman: (Default)
[personal profile] caddyman
The question of the moment is whether or not I should blow a fiver plus three quid postage and packing on a pair of Lennon specs with psychedelic lenses...

Twenty years or so ago, I had a mirrored pair that almost, but not quite, entirely failed to suit me. They weren't UV resistant though, and these are.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-09 12:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cybersofa.livejournal.com
Eight quid for a psychedelic outlook's got to be a barg.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-09 12:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jfs.livejournal.com
Link to the page? My current sunglasses are a little bit too RAWK! for some people.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-09 12:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] caddyman.livejournal.com
On ebay here.

He has more than one lot for sale, and they'd look better on you anyway.


(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-09 01:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ysharros.livejournal.com
One or the other of you go for it! Get Lennonised!

(no subject)

Date: 2005-12-09 01:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] binidj.livejournal.com
I find that UV resistant glasses almost always suit people better than the non-UV resistant ones ... must be the bounced radiation affecting the brain of the observer in some subtle manner.

If they will cause you to feel good, buy them.
From: [identity profile] littleonions.livejournal.com
I got my first pair of non national health glasses when I was quite young. They were round, gold, wire frame. I loved them...for about three days, then John Lennon got shot, I don't think I will ever forgive him for the next year of moronic heckling I went through.

Profile

caddyman: (Default)
caddyman

April 2023

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
1617 1819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags