Fire broadsides!

Monday, January 29th, 2007 03:40 pm
caddyman: (Default)
[personal profile] caddyman
I don’t seem to be able to dispense with the nautical theme today. I was mooching about on teh intarweb last night and came across some art prints of various Royal Navy ships, primarily but not exclusively, dreadnoughts of the First World War. I think that I am going to have to treat myself to one of the cheaper reproductions in the near future. You wouldn’t believe the prices some of them fetch (or more precisely the prices they try to charge), particularly the bigger ones. If the picture is a limited edition print – actually printed, numbered and signed by the artist, it’s not so bad, but for what amounts to a photograph of the artwork that just happens to be printed on reasonable quality heavy paper…

Well.

So anyway, I may take a trip down to the Imperial War Museum on Wednesday and take a look around. With luck they may have some reasonably sized and priced prints, or at least be able to provide pointers to where I can get something at a reasonable price.

I have been (especially) interested in naval history and warships since I was about 8 when someone (Mum, probably) bought me an Airfix model of HMS Victorious. It’s one of those interests that just sprung up and never went away. I’m less interested in modern warships, powerful as they may be, visually they are blando di tutti blandi; not enough twiddly bits, see?

If I can find a good print of HMS Warspite, I shall be in hog heaven. Failing that, a good picture of any of her sisters of the Queen Elizabeth class would do. Or the “Mighty Hood”.

I have seen this nice pair of HMS Barham and HMS Royal Oak at Jutland that would fit the bill.

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
HMS Barham and the 5th Battle Squadron, Jutland 1916


Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
HMS Royal Oak at Jutland 1916


or this:

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
HMS Warspite and HMS Ramilles, off Normandy, June 1944
.

Fantastic.

Warspite, Illustrious, Gerald Ford

Date: 2007-01-29 06:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] drjohnsilence.livejournal.com
Gregg Easterbrook has an excellent little rant that I suspect you'll appreciate on the subject of American warship names over at Tuesday Morning Quarterback. It's about halfway down the linked page. Here's a sample:

"Next, the Cruiser Mark Foley : The Navy just announced its next supercarrier will be the Gerald Ford. The ship is the first of a new design supplanting the current Nimitz-class, and thus the new class of supercarriers will also be named Ford-class. The three most recent supercarriers, the Harry Truman, Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, are all named for presidents. This is a big step up from the previous supercarrier, the John Stennis, which was named for a congressional committee chairman who opposed the civil rights legislation of the 1960s and whose main accomplishment in the Senate was never saying no to a Pentagon budget overrun. The British Navy has ships with glorious names such as Illustrious and Invincible. America has ships named after committee chairmen!"

NFL fans, traditional males who like cheerleaders, or anyone with an eclectic sense of humour (and I suspect that includes most people here...) should check out TMQ throughout the American Football season. Of course, that ends this Sunday, so my timing is not the best for this pointer.

Profile

caddyman: (Default)
caddyman

April 2023

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
1617 1819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags