Tolkein about books...

Wednesday, April 18th, 2007 02:34 pm
caddyman: (Default)
[personal profile] caddyman
Time was I would read any amount of fantasy or science fiction, but frankly over the past ten years or so, my interest has waned in the written form of the genre, though I still like a good science fiction or fantasy movie even if there are very few of the latter.

Like many fans current and lapsed of the genre, I got going with Tolkein. I have long since lost count of the number of times I read The Hobbit and Lord of the Rings (though neither, it has to be admitted, recently). I have a fair number of the books published post mortem, of which I confess I have only read The Silmarillion, which I tackled close on thirty years ago and frankly, it’s staying read (although I have revisited the bit at the end about the war of the ring a couple of times). I have unread copies of Unfinished Tales, The Book of Lost Tales (volumes 1 & 2) and The Lays of Beleriand. The latter is just two long narrative poems covering events already written in prose in the Silmarillion. I don’t actually know why I bought it, unless I was feeling suitably pseudy at the time –I can’t remember- since I always gloss over Tolkein’s poetry. It may be big, it may be clever, but it’s crushingly boring.

Anyway, thirty or so years is enough for me to remember that worthy as it may have been, The Silmarillion is not an easy read; too many genealogical lists of names that are both similar and unpronounceable, especially when it is important in the narrative to know precisely who begat whom. I recall finishing the book with a profound sense of relief, having doggedly refused to put it down unfinished. The remainder of my Tolkein collection is something that gets dipped into from time to time, but not read outright. After the Lays of Beleriand I decided not to spend any more cash on the remaining ‘History of Middle Earth’ series as the balance of written JRR to editorial C Tolkein slipped inexorably in favour of the latter as he raided the Great Man’stm waste paper bin for ever more obscure fragments.

I am at a loss, therefore, to explain why I have just ordered a copy of Children of Hurin from Amazon. Probably, I guess, because thirty years is long enough to remember the fact of things, but it is also long enough to gloss over the emotional drain that it entailed.

Plus there’s a gap on my bookshelf that will take just that volume.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-04-18 01:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] failing-angel.livejournal.com
There was a news item on Monday's Newsnight about this.
Perhaps the interest lies in the lack of hobbits and other such popularist elements?

(no subject)

Date: 2007-04-18 04:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sack-boy.livejournal.com
From my experience of failing to read the silly marillion twice, and then following a chum's advice:

1) Start at chapter 2 or 3 avoiding all the dire genealogy

2) Read to the end

3) Read the missed chapters now that your brain has been conditioned

I found I was able to read it easily then.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-04-18 07:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ladkyis.livejournal.com
OR you simply decide after chapter one of that hobbit thing that you will not be reading any more of that flowery waffle and your life can remain pure and unsullied by things tolkienesque - Please to note that I tried reading it when they first came out!!! they were pants then and they ain't changed.

ps I like good fantasy and I don't care what anyone says middle earth is the emperor's new clothes of literature

(no subject)

Date: 2007-04-18 07:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wallabok.livejournal.com
don't worry I ordered a copy of Children of Hurin as well...lol

Profile

caddyman: (Default)
caddyman

April 2023

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
1617 1819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags