The horror, the horror!
Thursday, March 13th, 2008 01:58 pmGod help me, but I can’t get "Something Tells Me (Something’s Gonna Happen Tonight)" by Cilla Black out of my head.
It’s Wogan’s fault, he played it on the radio this morning and it’s bored its way into my skull and stuck until something equally catchy pops up to dislodge it. That will be some hours at best as I do not have my walkman with me today. I probably shouldn’t mention that I even looked (out of idle curiosity, thank you) on Play.com to see if they had any “Best of” albums.
And they do. For £12.99 I could own a collection that runs from 1963 to 1978 and features 80-odd singles. I’ve even heard of many of them. I feel old.
To break me of this, I see that today’s Times has listed their movie critic’s top ten scariest horror movies:
I have to confess that I have not seen either Ringu or Don’t Look Now. When I was 18, a heavily cut copy of The Texas Chainsaw Massacre put me off ham sandwiches for over a year. I was a tender flower in those days.
A lot of these films have lost their shock value these days, though I think Psycho and Alien would still grab the first-time viewer by the entrails at the appropriate moments.
What should have been on that list and is missing, what is on that list that shouldn’t be?
Entertain me with lively debate: I am bored and I still have Cilla Black rattling around my head. Now there’s a horror movie.
Edited to add: Two films that I particularly like and one, certainly, is very creey are: The Haunting (1963, dir. Robert Wise) and Night of the Demon (1957, dir. Jacques Tourneur) - despite the latter's cheesy demon effect toward the end of the movie.
It’s Wogan’s fault, he played it on the radio this morning and it’s bored its way into my skull and stuck until something equally catchy pops up to dislodge it. That will be some hours at best as I do not have my walkman with me today. I probably shouldn’t mention that I even looked (out of idle curiosity, thank you) on Play.com to see if they had any “Best of” albums.
And they do. For £12.99 I could own a collection that runs from 1963 to 1978 and features 80-odd singles. I’ve even heard of many of them. I feel old.
To break me of this, I see that today’s Times has listed their movie critic’s top ten scariest horror movies:
The Exorcist (1973);
The Blair Witch Project (1999);
Psycho (1960);
Alien (1979);
Ringu (1998) – Nakata’s original, not the remake;
The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (1974);
Hallowe’en (1978);
Dawn of the Dead (1978);
Don’t Look Now (1973);
The Sixth Sense (1999).
I have to confess that I have not seen either Ringu or Don’t Look Now. When I was 18, a heavily cut copy of The Texas Chainsaw Massacre put me off ham sandwiches for over a year. I was a tender flower in those days.
A lot of these films have lost their shock value these days, though I think Psycho and Alien would still grab the first-time viewer by the entrails at the appropriate moments.
What should have been on that list and is missing, what is on that list that shouldn’t be?
Entertain me with lively debate: I am bored and I still have Cilla Black rattling around my head. Now there’s a horror movie.
Edited to add: Two films that I particularly like and one, certainly, is very creey are: The Haunting (1963, dir. Robert Wise) and Night of the Demon (1957, dir. Jacques Tourneur) - despite the latter's cheesy demon effect toward the end of the movie.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-13 02:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-13 02:23 pm (UTC)She was, apparently, very nearly Michael Caine's girlfriend in "The Italian Job".
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-13 02:12 pm (UTC)Jaws is scary. It is!
Copycat scared me, sixth sense didn't really apart from not wanting to see the blown out head and the cyclist appearing in the window - that was scary.
The one with whatsher name who eventually dies in the bath is scary. It's quite famous. Bunny boiler one.
I've not seen any of the others. Maybe I should!
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-13 02:24 pm (UTC)Jumpy horror has no lasting effect. The less you see the scarier it is.
Best of all is when you go to a film having not much idea about and few expectations...I saw Ringu that way and I've never seen an audience freak like that film made them freak but sadly now it's so famous people's expectations are built up and so it sort of looses it's power.
Generally Japanese horror is pretty good because it's so far removed from the conventions of western horror that you can't predict where it's going as easily as you would normally.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-13 06:29 pm (UTC)However, I did find Gothika to be scary in a kind of "ohmigod this could happen to anyone and noone would listen" kind of way.
I think one of the scariest films I have ever seen is "Pet Semetary". And I love "The Shining".
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-13 02:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-13 02:16 pm (UTC)I'd add a few more psych-horror things like David Lynch stuff EG: Fire Walk With Me, Mulholland Drive, Inland Empire, Blue Velvet, EraserHead and some Twin peaks. Cronenberg too.
I also find Onibaba (60's Japanese film) somewhat creepy in the right circumstances
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-13 02:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-13 02:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-13 06:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-14 12:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-13 02:33 pm (UTC)Pompety-pom-pom, pompety-pom-pom, pompety-pom-pom, Pompety-pom!
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-13 02:39 pm (UTC)Then there needs to be large doses of "An American Werewolf in London" and "Cube".
When I have tunes stuck in my head I sing (if that's the right word) the theme tune for "Roobarb and Custard" in my head and it all goes away.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-13 04:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-13 02:44 pm (UTC)The Blair Witch Project, on the other hand, scared the bejeezus out of me and still does.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-13 02:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-13 02:51 pm (UTC)I don't like the guy stading in the corner at the end of Blair Witch...I don't like him at all *shudder*
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-13 02:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-13 03:22 pm (UTC)If you like that kind of thing and you haven't seen it already I'd recommend 'Mulholland Drive', Lynch makes broad daylight with nothing bloody happening scary, plus it's got Naomi Watts acting her arse off and a moment of horrible sadness that both makes total sense and none - i've never seen heartbreaking and scary done at the same time before and not only that but carried via such an odd medium (excuse deliberate vagueness)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-13 03:38 pm (UTC)I tend to avoid Lynch because sexual violence falls off the "horror" and into the "this isn't fun and is going to give me nightmares for weeks", which is a shame because I love what I have seen of his.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-13 03:47 pm (UTC)Yes!
OK, Mulholland Drive isn't Blue Velvet it's more emotional nastiness between the two female leads but I dunno, you may wish to avoid it. What I like about his stuff is sometimes people acuse him of weirdness for weirdness' sake but I don't buy that, weirdness for it's only sake is amusing for a bit but mainly dull. When something leaves you feeling unsettled for weeks and freaked out by merely remembering, especially when it's something that on the surface is very innocuous then you know he's flown in under you radar and hit something that you weren't even aware was there and that's amazing.
But fair enough I know that other people also think he slips over the line sometimes.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-13 04:00 pm (UTC)We were pretty unanimous in finding the opening title sequence to be amongst the most unsettling things we'd ever seen on screen. And all it is, is Dexter making breakfast...
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-13 04:08 pm (UTC)Yes, but with such terrible manners.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-13 02:50 pm (UTC)No Wicker Man?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-13 02:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-13 03:01 pm (UTC)Haven't seen Psycho;
As for the others - Dawn of the Dead isn't that scary, I prefer Night of the Living Dead;
Sixth Sense is a nice film, but no-way is it scary.
Texas Chainsaw Massacre is very dated, and rather dull (aside from the farcical moment with grampaw trying to hold a hammer).
From what little I've seen of it, I quite like Nightmare on Elm St.
Blair Witch is a film that I feel is generally underrated (as well as being one of those 'Marmite' choices), but I like it.
As for what is scary - Curse of the Cat People, or other horror from the 1940s - sometime when the horror was with the mood and atmosphere rather than the sfx or red paint.
Mind you, define 'horror'?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-13 03:28 pm (UTC)Unease is when you hear that an axe-weilding maniac is loose in your town.
Foreboding is when you see a shadow on the front door, and you look but it is gone, and you sware that you didn't leave the backdoor open... you know something is wrong but you don't know what.
Horror is where you see the trail of blood on the carpet and follow it up the stairs...
Terror is when the blood-soacked axe-weilding maniac leaps out at you from behind the bedroom door.
So often movie makers, particually in the late 90s, forgot what Horror was and went for Terror instead. Terror is Horror's weaker cousin - in a way it's a release - you scream but then you are into the whole fight-or-flight thing. Terror is a punch in the face - over and done with - shocking and perhaps painful but ultimately a one-trick-pony, whereas Horror is a slow emotional thumbscrew - building and building until you just have to scream.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-13 03:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-13 03:45 pm (UTC)So often movie makers, particually in the late 90s, forgot what Horror was and went for Terror instead
You make some good points, but I think that Terror came in in a big way from the late 70s and through the 80s.
But there's also the issue of believability - I can imagine The Wicker Man happening, I can't say the same for Dawn of the Dead.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-13 04:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-13 04:41 pm (UTC)Nothing can ever compete with the imagination.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-14 02:02 pm (UTC)If that doesn't at least compete with your imagination you might want to consider medication. :o)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-14 01:17 pm (UTC)And yes, it is sampled on a Kate Bush album.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-13 04:58 pm (UTC)I also like 'Ring'. I didn't find 'The Blair Witch Project' scary at all, I felt a bit scammed. 'The Exorcist' makes me laugh - I've probably seen it parodied too many times.
I saw 'Silent Hill' recently and thought that was very scary.
'The Devil's Backbone' is amazing, by the same guy as 'Pan's Labyrinth' and 'Hellboy'.
I seem to remember finding 'Brimstone and Treacle' by Dennis Potter deeply disturbing, though it is a long time since I saw it, and it's not technically a film.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-13 05:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-13 07:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-14 05:48 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-13 07:35 pm (UTC)Didn't get scared at Blair Witch, it's the other Blair that scares me more, no not Isla, I mean Tony.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-14 02:21 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-14 12:44 pm (UTC)I'm with Bry: the only film I've ever seen that genuinely scared me was The Haunting, and apparently the original book, The Haunting of Hill House is admirably creepy too.
Otherwise, Alien always grips me, but Blair Witch was a disappointment: all that build-up and a few blurred images in the last couple of shots. I still can't tell what happened.