Astronomy Domine
Wednesday, August 16th, 2006 02:40 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
This report from Auntie tells us that scientists are meeting in Prague to reclassify certain astronomical bodies in the solar system. If they agree, and it seems likely that they will, we will no longer have 9 planets in the solar system, but 12. Pluto will be relegated to the “second division” of planets along with newcomers, Ceres, Charon and the only one with its own post code: Xena (2003 UB313).
Ceres is in orbit between Mars and Jupiter and may or may not be classified as a planet but the largest (known) asteroid although it is spherical, while Pluto, Charon and Xena, right out at the far reaches of the system are likely to be reclassified as dwarf planets, or Plutons1, which are bodies with enough gravity to arrange themselves into a largely spherical shape. There is some dispute about Charon; some astronomers suggest it is a moon of Pluto, others call it a twin planet (or, I suppose, pluton).
I quite liked the idea of plutons exerting enough gravity to form globes until I looked in the mirror. Suddenly I’m not so sure, maybe we should stick with “icy dwarfs”, though that would just transfer body image problems from me to small people2.
With all the talk of Kuiper Belts and Oort Clouds and such, I wonder why there has been no mention of the Van Halen Belt, that small area of stars that spills out Hard Rock? 3.
1Send all jokes based around Who Killed the Plutons elsewhere, please. Unless they are really good.
2But they’re only short arses, so who cares?
3Yes, I know. And I don’t care, so nyah, nyah, nyah..
Ceres is in orbit between Mars and Jupiter and may or may not be classified as a planet but the largest (known) asteroid although it is spherical, while Pluto, Charon and Xena, right out at the far reaches of the system are likely to be reclassified as dwarf planets, or Plutons1, which are bodies with enough gravity to arrange themselves into a largely spherical shape. There is some dispute about Charon; some astronomers suggest it is a moon of Pluto, others call it a twin planet (or, I suppose, pluton).
I quite liked the idea of plutons exerting enough gravity to form globes until I looked in the mirror. Suddenly I’m not so sure, maybe we should stick with “icy dwarfs”, though that would just transfer body image problems from me to small people2.
With all the talk of Kuiper Belts and Oort Clouds and such, I wonder why there has been no mention of the Van Halen Belt, that small area of stars that spills out Hard Rock? 3.
1Send all jokes based around Who Killed the Plutons elsewhere, please. Unless they are really good.
2But they’re only short arses, so who cares?
3Yes, I know. And I don’t care, so nyah, nyah, nyah..
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-16 01:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-16 01:53 pm (UTC)I suggest that you don't make that assumption...
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-16 02:08 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-16 02:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-16 02:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-16 02:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-16 02:32 pm (UTC)Your choice.
Oh to heck with it, .... I'll even offer a Nerve Pinch (TM Paramount Pictures) if you like
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-16 02:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-16 02:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-16 03:01 pm (UTC)p.s. Hello Bryan
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-16 03:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-16 02:23 pm (UTC)Requests for celestial bodies to be named Xena , Spock, Yavin, Hoth, Tatooine, Dagobah (and this is from a self confessed Star Wars geek) etc should be met with a swift crack round the bonce with the largest most heavy book of Mythology available....
Followed by a good kicking from me....
And no more named after bodily orifices and Disney dogs please !
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-16 02:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-16 02:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-16 02:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-18 05:34 am (UTC)Well he had a little Moon Unit. Poor, poor child.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-16 10:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-16 10:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-16 02:40 pm (UTC)Must... Not... Make... Sarcastic... Comment...
failed
Date: 2006-08-16 02:42 pm (UTC)Re: failed
Date: 2006-08-16 03:04 pm (UTC)Re: failed
Date: 2006-08-16 04:25 pm (UTC)So I'm only helping really.
Re: failed
Date: 2006-08-16 05:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-17 12:59 pm (UTC)