The great scon con

Wednesday, September 20th, 2006 09:49 pm
caddyman: (moley)
[personal profile] caddyman
To compound my earlier dietary forays, I have now eaten scones1. With butter. Maybe later I shall eat more with clotted cream and strawberry jam.

I have my Remagel tablets at the ready.


1The ones I eat rhyme with stone, cone and phone. They're better than those that rhyme eponymously with con.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-20 09:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davidt3001.livejournal.com
As American essays at the scone -- which rhymes with gone, one and Tron -- range between dismal and toxic, I make my own. I also explain tirelessly that they are meant to be fluffy, only slightly sweet (unless they contain cheese, in which case they shouldn't be sweet at all), and that a two inch diameter is as large as they should go. They definitely should not be the size and texture of a half brick.

It is curious that Americans can't make scones because they have the the mis-named biscuit. This item (from the South, apparently) is very close to a scone, although slightly fluffier and shortened with lard, rather than butter. It's great with a hunk of breakfast sausage.

Profile

caddyman: (Default)
caddyman

April 2023

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
1617 1819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags