Wednesday, September 9th, 2009

caddyman: (Continue Tour)
The past couple of days have been deceptively warm and calm, but not overtly sunny. I suspect that this is why since the weekend I have developed an irritating itch on my right shin. Last night I daubed skin cream all over it and that helped quite a bit. The skin is very dry on my shins and I suspect that it probably the major culprit.

The skin was a bit blotchy, but not badly so, though that didn’t stop Furtle from fretting that I might have that ‘you know, the itchy rash thing that makes your leg drop off and turns you into a shambling hulk’. Well, I’ve been half way there for years, so I doubt anyone would notice. Anyway, I spent a couple of minutes directing cold water at the offending patch of skin in the shower and that helped even more, so doubt it’s life threatening.

It flared up a little in the office this morning (dry air on dry skin in warm office – there’s a pattern here, I think), so I nipped to Boots at lunchtime expecting to spend ages trying to work out what of the many salves and unguents would work best on my poor abused leg.

Good old Boots. Like something out of Repo Man they sell some stuff called Itch Relief Cream. Does exactly what it says on the box. I like stuff that tells it like it is.
caddyman: (Continue Tour)
The past couple of days have been deceptively warm and calm, but not overtly sunny. I suspect that this is why since the weekend I have developed an irritating itch on my right shin. Last night I daubed skin cream all over it and that helped quite a bit. The skin is very dry on my shins and I suspect that it probably the major culprit.

The skin was a bit blotchy, but not badly so, though that didn’t stop Furtle from fretting that I might have that ‘you know, the itchy rash thing that makes your leg drop off and turns you into a shambling hulk’. Well, I’ve been half way there for years, so I doubt anyone would notice. Anyway, I spent a couple of minutes directing cold water at the offending patch of skin in the shower and that helped even more, so doubt it’s life threatening.

It flared up a little in the office this morning (dry air on dry skin in warm office – there’s a pattern here, I think), so I nipped to Boots at lunchtime expecting to spend ages trying to work out what of the many salves and unguents would work best on my poor abused leg.

Good old Boots. Like something out of Repo Man they sell some stuff called Itch Relief Cream. Does exactly what it says on the box. I like stuff that tells it like it is.

My name will be mud

Wednesday, September 9th, 2009 04:29 pm
caddyman: (Default)
I still haven't bought that birthday card!

Oh well, wander into Waitrose on way home, I guess.

My name will be mud

Wednesday, September 9th, 2009 04:29 pm
caddyman: (Default)
I still haven't bought that birthday card!

Oh well, wander into Waitrose on way home, I guess.
caddyman: (Opus Boogie)
I want, but can neither afford nor justify the remastered Beatles collection, which has been released today (or was it yesterday?). Moreover, I am convinced by the write up in today’s Times that despite being £30 more expensive and three albums shorter, the mono mix is the set to get (I have no idea why the pricing policy is so odd, but there you are).

The mono mix does not include the soundtrack to Yellow Submarine, Abbey Road or Let it Be the only Beatles albums to be issued originally for stereo, though the White Album was mixed for stereo in 1968, it was released in both formats, hence its inclusion here. The Beatles in Mono box is, as the Times would have it, “…the set aimed at the modern audiophile seeking the visceral oomph of early vinyl without forsaking digital technology’s ability to make the constituent parts of each song seem more distinct.”

The mono mixes will only be available in the box set, but stereo mixes will be available either in a box set or as individual albums. That set is thirty quid cheaper, too.

Maybe I should just not buy either, but I wants, my precious, I wants…
caddyman: (Opus Boogie)
I want, but can neither afford nor justify the remastered Beatles collection, which has been released today (or was it yesterday?). Moreover, I am convinced by the write up in today’s Times that despite being £30 more expensive and three albums shorter, the mono mix is the set to get (I have no idea why the pricing policy is so odd, but there you are).

The mono mix does not include the soundtrack to Yellow Submarine, Abbey Road or Let it Be the only Beatles albums to be issued originally for stereo, though the White Album was mixed for stereo in 1968, it was released in both formats, hence its inclusion here. The Beatles in Mono box is, as the Times would have it, “…the set aimed at the modern audiophile seeking the visceral oomph of early vinyl without forsaking digital technology’s ability to make the constituent parts of each song seem more distinct.”

The mono mixes will only be available in the box set, but stereo mixes will be available either in a box set or as individual albums. That set is thirty quid cheaper, too.

Maybe I should just not buy either, but I wants, my precious, I wants…

Profile

caddyman: (Default)
caddyman

April 2023

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
1617 1819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags